Showing posts with label conspiracy theories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy theories. Show all posts

Masonic Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theory Masons

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Patrick Dey


There are two things I found surprising when I became a Mason. Firstly, the number of us who, even after hearing all the conspiracy theories about the Freemasons, still became Freemasons. I think every Mason is a little weird because of that. There is something a little off about each of us. Secondly, even with all the conspiracy theories about the Freemasons, it is surprising how many Masons have their own conspiracy theories about our fraternity.


I’m not talking about those Masons who, when passing through Denver International Airport, pull out their dues card and swipe it over the cornerstone, just to see if it’s true what they say. I will never forget the time a brother from another lodge told me about newly made Master Mason they had just raised. A few meetings after he passed his catechism, he finally asked when he gets his secret access to DIA. He and a few others thought he was joking and laughed it off. Then seeing his straight face, they had to tell him that all that is false. He demitted a few weeks later. Again, there is something a little off about every Freemason.


Then there are some really strange Masonic conspiracy theories. Several years ago my lodge was broken into. Just some broken glass, a few things rummaged through, and the Tiler’s sword and jewel were stolen. One of the brothers who was with me at the time said that this could be the work of clandestine Masons who break into true and lawful lodges to steal paraphernalia to use in their clandestine lodges. He actually said this in front of the cop who was taking the report, who gave us an inquisitive look, and I had to explain that Freemasons have their own conspiracy theories.


I’m not really interested in discussing any of this sort of stuff. I just need to illustrate the conditioning conspiracy theories have on Freemasons and that we tend to think the way conspiracy theorists themselves think. In particular, it is interesting to me the number of Masonic-origin theories that possess the same thought processes that conspiracy theorists have.


In particular, I think of theories such as that Freemasonry comes from the Knights Templar, the cults of Mithras, the Eleusinian Mysteries, the Roman collegia, or the Artists of Dionysus (the so-called “Dionysiac Architects”), the Druids, you name it. Sometimes it is a combination of these things, such as that put forth by Hipólito José da Costa, who posited that the Dionysiac Artificers passed their rites and wisdom onto the Hebrews, who passed it onto the Essenes, who then went underground until the Crusades and emerge as the Freemasons via the Knights Templar. Manly P. Hall, who was heavily influenced by da Costa’s essay, would skip the Essenes and would simply say that the Dionysiac Architects would just go underground until the Middle Ages when they reemerge and start to build the cathedrals of Europe… but then he gives a second version, in which the Dionysiac Architects passed their knowledge to the Templars, who in turn spread these things throughout Europe. Yeah, almost back-to-back he contradicts himself.


This is what I find fascinating, namely the conspiracy thinking that a group would go underground and reemerge later. How could these guys possibly know these groups went underground? There is absolutely no evidence for this. Well, that’s the conspiracy thinking: the lack of evidence is proof of how secretive they were.


Christopher Hitchens would create a rational maxim, which has been named after him. Hitchens’ razor states: “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” Now, this was originally used as an atheistic argument, as it comes from his 2007 book God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. He must be a delight at holiday parties. He’s one of those “New Atheists,” and yeah, he would like to see everyone become atheists, and he is rather obnoxious about it.


This razor follows from Bertrand Russell’s strawman analogy of a teapot that orbits the sun between Earth and Mars. It is too small to be seen by a telescope, but you also cannot disprove that it is not out there. Russell was an atheist, so obviously he is establishing who has the burden of proof of the existence of God, just like the person who claims there is a space teapot is the one who bears the burden of proof, not the people who don’t believe it. Add to this Carl Sagan’s maxim, called Sagan’s Standard: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Atheists have a surprising number of quippy sayings and analogies.


But this post isn’t about atheism. Hitchens’ razor has been taken up by several philosophical thinkers as well as scientists, in particular when dealing with pseudoscientific conspiracies and discourse. For instance, the theory of Atlantis. Atlantis is a case of “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” And there is no extraordinary evidence. There isn’t even evidence. It is just “Plato said…” and wishful thinking.


Masonic origin theories frequently use arguments that conspiracy theorists and pseudoscientists use. A common argument is the “it looks like…” argument. Ever heard of the conspiracy theory of pyramids in Antarctica? There isn’t a pyramid in Antarctica, it is just that there is a mountain that kind of “looks like” a pyramid. How about the Bimini Road? It is an underwater rock formation that looks like a road (or a wall), because of how the formation formed and then eroded as sea levels rose over thousands of years.


We see this in Masonic origin theories. For instance, the cults of Mithras: they kind of look like Masonic lodges. It is actually kind of weird how similar Mithraicism is to Freemasonry. But there is no connection between them. The cults of Mithras were stomped out in the fourth century CE and the first stonemason guilds are recorded in the eleventh century CE. There is about a 600 or 700-year gap. Still, I know a Mason, a very intelligent, well-read, well-versed in technical research Mason, who believes there is a connection — he believes one day he will be able to demonstrate how the cults of Mithras survived underground for six centuries, even though there has been zero evidence for such. He knows there is no evidence, but he is determined to prove it nonetheless just because he believes it.


This isn’t uncommon in my opinion: that a very intelligent Mason would believe in something without any evidence beyond wishful thinking. In particular, I am thinking of the claim here in Colorado that there is a lodge in southern Colorado that has the signatures of Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday in their sign-in register, implying that they were Masons. There is no evidence for such, whatsoever. No lodge or Grand Lodge claims them as one of their own. King Solomon Lodge in Tombstone only has evidence that Virgil Earp petitioned to be made a Mason and that he was rejected. Both men were regarded in their time as gangsters, gamblers, drinkers, frequenters of prostitutes, et al. Not exactly prime candidates for the Degrees of Masonry. Earp did later become an Odd Fellow, but not a Mason. Nowhere in the heavily scrutinized lives of these two men has there ever been a point that they could have possibly been made Masons. When I dispute those who claim a lodge in southern Colorado has them in their register, I am told that I need to disprove it, because they believe it.


No. No, I don’t. They need to prove it. In my experience with this sort of goose chase, I will first need to deeply research both men’s lives, especially around the timeframe they were out West, and look for timeframes they were in or near southern Colorado. Then I will need to schedule time off from work, and schedule time with the lodge secretary or building association to look at their records. I’m going to assume their old records are in a very disorganized and dusty closet. So I will probably need a whole day just to organize and dust things off. Then get a hotel room. Come back the next day and start going through the registers and minutes. No one ever said the minutes, but I will check them anyway. I will need to familiarize myself with the Secretary’s handwriting. I will first check the timeframes that I know these men were in southern Colorado, then broaden my search to the entire period they were out West. And when I report that no such evidence exists at this lodge, and that’s when I will be told: “Actually, it was this other lodge.” Then I would have to start the process all over again. And I don’t have that kind of time and money to disprove something that I really don’t even care about, because there is no evidence.


It is strange to me that Masons think this way, given how conspiracy theorists talk about Freemasonry. Have you met someone talking about how the Masons control everything, know where the Ark of the Covenant is located, and have the records of Jesus’s bloodline, or whatever? Then you reveal that you are a Mason and none of that is true. That’s when they say, “Well, you haven’t gotten to a high enough position to be given those secrets.” And even when you tell them that you are a Past Master, Knight Templar, 32°, Shriner, Knight Mason, KYCH, Rosicrucian, St. Thomas of Acon, et cetera, they still say that you haven’t gotten high enough to know these things. Of course, if any of us Masons haven’t gotten powerful enough to know these things, how did these non-Masons learn these things? Isn’t all that stuff supposed to be super-duper-secret? So secret that even the rank and file of the fraternity aren’t allowed to know any of it? So how did these outsiders get this non-existent information?


I suppose that it shouldn’t be surprising that some Masons think this way. Masonry is largely founded upon legends and tales, and these are important, because Masonry is established upon them. Can you imagine the Blue Lodge without the Hiramic Legend? Yes, there was once the Noahite Legend of the Third Degree, but can you imagine doing that instead of the Hiramic Legend? The Legend of the Royal Arch, the Order of the Temple, et al. These do not really necessitate evidence and critical analysis, because they are myths: they hold a larger function than factuality. It doesn’t mean they are not subject to analysis and interpretation, or even criticism, but they are not the same as, say, the claims that Freemasonry comes from the Gnostics. Just because Masonry has foundation myths does not mean we should believe any Masonic theory without evidence, or with flimsy evidence, or even wishful thinking.


We really should be thinking more critically than the conspiracy theories about our fraternity.

~PD

Patrick M. Dey is a Past Master of Nevada Lodge No. 4 in the ghost town of Nevadaville, Colorado, and currently serves as their Secretary, and is also a Past Master of Research Lodge of Colorado. He is a Past High Priest of Keystone Chapter No. 8, Past Illustrious Master of Hiram Council No. 7, Past Commander of Flatirons Commandery No. 7. He currently serves as the Exponent (Suffragan) of Colorado College, SRICF of which he is VIII Grade (Magister). He is the Editor of the Rocky Mountain Mason magazine, serves on the Board of Directors of the Grand Lodge of Colorado’s Library and Museum Association, and is the Deputy Grand Bartender of the Grand Lodge of Colorado (an ad hoc, joke position he is very proud to hold). He holds a Masters of Architecture degree from the University of Colorado, Denver, and works in the field of architecture in Denver, where he resides with wife and son.

Cognitive Dissonance and Conspiracy: An insight into anti-Masonic rhetoric

by Midnight Freemason Guest Contributor
Andrew Rizzitello

Image by Bennet

A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know
it.
~Agent K, Men in Black (1997)

Satanism. New World Order. Lizard people. Blood sacrifice. These are just some of the
unscrupulous ideas that have surrounded our Fraternity; many of which started before
the formation of the United Grand Lodge of England. But where did they come from
and why did they start? Some point to the Roman Catholic Church and its Papacy,
others to the various “exposés” created by both non and anti-Masonic writers, and still
some point to various political leaders, whose cult of personality kindled sparks of
violence against any group that met “in secret”. In an endeavor to combat these
thoughts, one does not have to look too far, but one does have to let go of any form of
confirmation bias. The purpose of this essay is to assist those that wish to gain the
knowledge to disprove and debunk these inane theories, to aide those who may
question the legitimacy of the claims, and shed light on the enemies and naysayers of
not just our great Fraternity, but any group that hopes to better the world through
friendship and brotherhood. Before we begin, however, we will need to understand
some psychological terms.

CB/CD

No, it is not the newest Hard Rock band coming out of Australia. This abbreviation
stands for Confirmation Bias/Cognitive Dissonance, terms which go hand in hand when
a person encounters new, possibly contradictory, information to something they are
familiar with. Take this phrase, for example:

“Cleopatra lived closer in time to the launch of the iPhone than she did to
the building of the pyramids.”

At first, someone who reads that phrase may exclaim “No way!”, since Egypt, the
pyramids, and Cleopatra all seem to blend together in our mind. That exclamation, or
one like it, is a small bit of our cognitive dissonance showing. We were presented with
new information and, at first, went on the defensive, since our previous knowledge of the
subject suggested otherwise. What happens next determines if we can overcome this
dissonance or fall into the mire of confirmation bias.

If the individual decides to explore the statement further, they will find that the
approximate date for the creation of the Great Pyramid is around 2478 BCE
(Dominguez), and this predates the life of Cleopatra by about 2500 years (Elhassan). It
is amazing to think that the famed Queen of the Nile wasn’t even a blip in the universe
when the construction of one of the 7 Wonders of the Natural World occurred.

However, if the individual continues to deny the plausibility of the claim, this is when the
mental quicksand of confirmation bias starts to take hold. An example of this could be
seen when, after being presented with the information, the person states that
“technology just couldn’t advance that quickly…” and simply walks away from the
conversation, choosing to remain ignorant. Confirmation bias can be seen most
prominently in today’s socio-political climate when a person, presented with new medical
or scientific research, refuses to believe the change and, even if their data was at one
time correct, continues to rely on outdated or blatantly wrong treatments or theories. An
infuriating example of this, which itself has devolved into its own conspiracy, would be
the argument that vaccines somehow cause autism. Too many sites exist (about
19,900,000 results via Google) that absolutely debunk this mindset and yet it remains
prevalent in today’s society (Hoffman).

While both cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias happen to someone when presented
with new or conflicting ideas, the former can be overcome with logic and reasoning, while the
latter is nothing more than choosing to remain ignorant and in the dark. As Masons, we are
taught to be the bearers of truth and light, meaning we must learn to deal with our own
CB/CD before relaying new information to others. Due diligence and proper research are a
must.

Freemasonry and the Catholic Church: An Age Old, One Sided
Rivalry


Any Mason who has done the slightest bit of digging will know that the Roman Catholic
Church has not had the most favorable view of the Fraternity. Even today, the Church holds true to its stance that the "faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin…” (Ratzinger) and, at first, are unable to receive Holy Communion, and then, if still resilient in their Masonic affiliation, will be excommunicated. The origin of this stems from a papal bull written in 1738 by Pope Clement XII named In eminenti apostolatus specula. The reason for the production of this bull came about because of a conflict between the Jacobites (supporters of King James II and a primarily Catholic group) and the Hanoverians (supporters of William III and Mary II, and primarily Protestant). Both of these groups formed and had Masonic Lodges throughout the countries of Europe, but the problem arose when the preferred religious stance of the Lodges came into question.

You see, the Jacobite lodges, while being primarily Catholic, allowed Protestants to join, and
the Hanoverian lodges, primarily Protestant in nature, allowed Catholics admittance. This did
not sit well with leaders of the two factions, notably James Fances Edward Stuart and Cardinal André-Hercule de Fleury. James saw that Hanoverian Freemasons in France had recruited so many Catholics to their cause that it tipped power in the Grande Loge de France. This alarmed James so much that he asked Pope Clement to issue a bull that banned Hanoverian Freemasonry from any Catholic country in Europe (Corp).

Meanwhile, the Cardinal, as chief minister to Louis XV of France, was trying to keep peace with Britain. After Jacobite Freemasons, who had formed secret lodges in France, tried to influence him, he had their premises raided. These actions on their part led to the Cardinal urging the Pope to ban all Roman Catholics (Hanoverian, Jacobite, and everything in between) from becoming a Freemason, under the penalty of excommunication. For a Roman Catholic during this time, separation from the church was devastating and could induce a very real fear or dread.

Pope Clement, upon receiving both of these communications, sought to write the bull in such a way that it did not distinguish between these two forms of Masonry. Opting for a religious
approach rather than a political one, he criticized Freemasonry because of its openness to any
man, regardless of religion. He added that many governments saw the Masonic lodges
"spreading far and wide and daily growing in strength" as a threat that should be "prudently
eliminated", so far as to call for bishops and Inquisitors to search for signs of suspected heresy (Clement).

As stated previously, the ideals in this centuries old, misguided writing are still upheld, even if
the current Pontiff seems to be more lax than his predecessors. 

The Bavarian Illuminati: How Not to Make a Secret Society

Second only to the Taxil Hoax, claims that Freemasonry and its members have infiltrated all aspects of a conspiracy theorist's life through the power of The Illuminati are probably the most abundant. While the majority of these inane theories are laughable at best, such as knowing rappers like Jay Z and Eminen are Illuminati members because they use triangular hand gestures, there is a more nefarious and dangerous side. Individuals who claim that there is a secret cabal planning a new world order, one run by Illuminati Freemason elites, are often citing ideas found in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, among other anti-semitic ideologies.

These ideas helped many a despot come to power, most notably Adolf Hitler.
But where did these Illuminati claims originate? 

It all started in 1776, with a man named Adam Weishaupt. Mr. Weishaupt was a professor of
law and, later, canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. While there, he was the only
non-clerical member of its staff, the rest being former members of the Jesuit order. The Jesuits, even though their order had been dissolved by Pope Clement XIV, were constantly harassing and discrediting any non clerical worker who brought forth any idea they deemed “liberal” or “Protestant”. This pushed Adam to become increasingly anti-Clerical and solidify his beliefs in rationalism and the Enlightenment (Stauffer).

Originally, Weishaupt rejected Freemasonry, as he found it too expensive and not open to his
ideas. His order was "to put an end to the machinations of the purveyors of injustice, to control them without dominating them." So, on May 1, 1776, he, along with 4 students, formed the Covenant of Perfectibility, only to change the name to The Order of the Illuminati in 1778. The founding members all chose aliases for themselves, taking inspiration from Greek mythology. From ‘76-’78, the membership grew to some 27 individuals, all of which learned secret grips and words, in a similar manner as our own, and some were even allowed to actively recruit new members. Weishaupt kept tabs on his members by a system of espionage within the Order; both to keep control and see who he wanted to become a member of the ruling council, or Areopagus.

Although Weishaupt initially wanted nothing to do with Freemasonry, he eventually did join. This action was two fold: on one hand, Adam had a hard time keeping his own members from joining our Fraternity and, on the other, he wanted more material to help expand his own degree system. He received his degrees under the Rite of Strict Observance, in a lodge called
Prudence. His mercenary motives did not yield any of the mysteries he wanted, as he thought
there were “higher degrees” than what the Blue Lodge had to offer. This, however, did not
dissuade him from forming his own lodge under a warrant issued from the Grand Lodge of
Prussia, called the Royal York of Friendship [ yes, that’s the entire name of the Grand Lodge
(United Grand Lodges of Germany)] named Theodore of Good Council. Shortly after filling
this lodge with his own members, Weishaupt separated from the aforementioned Grand Lodge by way of recognition with the Premier Grand Lodge of England, allowing Theodore of Good Council to begin creating subordinate lodges of their own (Le Forestier, 193-201).

During this time, Weishaupt came across a young man named Adolph Knigge, who would prove to be incredibly important in recruitment and ritual formation of the Illuminati. Knigge was of a similar mindset to Weishaupt; both men wanted more out of Freemasonry. Achieving all that there was in the Craft at the time, Knigge was intrigued by the “higher learning” that was supposedly available in Weishaupt’s group. Knigge even went so far as to recruit for Weishaupt, but was constantly embarrassed when he could not produce evidence of the existence of these “higher degrees” or “Most Serene Superiors”. Weishaupt eventually admitted to Knigge that no such group existed and that the higher degrees still needed to be written (Le Forestier, 202-226). With that revelation, Weishaupt encouraged Knigge to write material for the higher degrees and promised aid in the endeavor. By January of 1782, Knigge had completely revamped the entire Illuminati structure, separating the individual grades into 3 classes: The Nursery, The Masonic Grades, and The Mysteries.

This, however, would ultimately prove to be the fall of the order. After expanding to many cities
outside of Bavaria such as Austria, Bratislava, Switzerland, and Milan, the Council of
Areopagites was replaced with the Council of Provincials.This new council achieved very little in terms of control and resulted in nothing more than a headache for Weishaupt. This was because many on the council favored Knigge’s more mystically oriented degrees and direction he was taking the order, rather than Weishaupt’s philosophical and (primarily) anti-clerical stance; a stance that also pushed back against Weishaupt’s continued insistence of recruiting
Freemasons, who were more mystically minded at the time. The infighting got to such a heated point that Weishaupt threatened to tell everyone that Knigge made up the “flawed” Priest ritual, to which Knigge responded by saying he would tell the world that the entirety of the Illuminati rituals were made up. In 1784, Knigge agreed to leave the order, and by virtue of an agreement, return all papers that were relevant. This agreement also saw Weishaupt retract all slanderous and derogatory statements against Kingge (Le Forestier). This departure was a deathblow to the Illuminati, as Knigge was their greatest asset, not only for his reorganizing and creation of the degrees, but also for his recruiting.

With that history lesson out of the way, we finally come to the reason why the conspiracy of
Illuminati still lingers. You see, as the order was bleeding out with the loss of Knigge, members in Munich were also causing problems because of their boastfulness and criticism of the monarchy. It soon became apparent that members of the Illuminati held office in state and governing bodies. While that number was small, it was still enough to attract the ire of the
populace, and examples of preferential legal treatment, anti-religious publications, and the
replacement of Jesuit positions in Ingolstadt only fueled that fire. This eventually led to Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in 1785 to ban all secret societies. Weishaupt, in the meantime, had fled, although documents were seized in 1786 and ‘87, and published by the government that detailed the order’s internal correspondences and dealings (Roberts 128-29).

About 10 years later, Augustin Barruel and John Robinson each published books (Memoirs
Illustrating the History of Jacobinism and Proofs of a Conspiracy, respectively) dealing with a
conspiracy that states the Illuminati had survived, are part of a broader, international conspiracy, and even spurred on the French Revolution. These claims were reprinted, cited, and used in other works in the following years, from books to sermons. This led to these claims making their way into newspaper articles, particularly in America, and, of course, political discourse, leading to the election of 1800 (Stauffer).

The Great Provocateur: Mr. Jogand-Pagès


We have finally arrived at what is probably the most often used and cited source of
anti-Masonic rhetoric that still persists to this day. Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès, better known by his pen name Leo Taxil, created one of the greatest lies about our Fraternity, all to get a rise out of members of the Catholic Church. The ideas and imagery expressed in Taxil’s work were so extravagant that he is even quoted as saying (Brayley, pg 228-229):

“I thought I would kill myself laughing at some of the things proposed, but everything went; there is no limit to human stupidity".

So, without further ado, let us head straight into the quackery that is the Taxil Hoax.

Mr. Jogand-Pages was a French journalist who was already known for his anti-Catholic and
anti-clerical views. Having been disillusioned with Catholic teachings after spending years in a Jesuit seminary school, he began writing about how religious ideology was harmful in society, sometimes under the pseudonym Prosper Manin. He first gained notoriety with his books La Bible amusante and La Vie de Jesus, which were satirical, yet critical, looks at Biblical hypocrisy and inconsistent storytelling. His next works were attacks on the clergy and the Pope, claiming them to be hedonists akin to the Marquis de Sade. However, it wasn’t until 1879 that the law actually got involved, and Mr. Jogand-Pages had to be acquitted of insulting a state recognized religion.

About five years later, Pope Leo XIII publish his encyclical Humanum Genus, which further attacked Freemasonry and split the human race into two groups:

separated into two diverse and opposite parts, of which the one steadfastly contends for truth and virtue, the other of those things which are contrary to virtue and to truth. The one is the kingdom of God on earth, namely, the true Church of Jesus Christ... The other is the kingdom of Satan... At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. (Roman Catholic Church)”

After seeing this, Jogand-Pages rebranded himself, coming out as Leo Taxil, and faked a conversion to the ways of the Catholic church. He also expressed that he would right the wrongs that were supposedly in his previous books. This is where Taxil started his anti-Masonic career.

The first work published by Taxil was a 4 volume “history” of Freemasonry, in which he wrote about the involvement of Satanic practices in Masonic rituals; all according to unverified “eyewitness” accounts. Taxil then partnered with a “Dr. Karl Hacks”, which was really an unnamed collaborator, to publish Le Diable au XIXe siècle (The Devil in the 19th Century), and introduced his protagonist, Diana Vaughn, to the anti-Masonic world. Diana was somehow supposedly related to Thomas Vaughn, a well known philosopher and alchemist. This book described Diana’s adventures in Freemasonry, in which she met with demons, one of which wrote prophecies on her back (Hause). After professing a love for Joan of Arc, the demons accosting Diana were driven away, and she was able to escape her involvement with Satanic Freemasonry. Taxil would go on to use this character to publish two books under her name, Eucharistic Novena, which was a collection of prayers, and Confessions of an Ex-Palladist, in which she described more of her supposed involvement within the Freemasons.

Also described in Le Diable au XIXe siècle, were a group known as the Palladists. This group,
hidden away in the highest echelons of Freemasonry (according to Taxil), were a cult that practiced Theistic Satanism, and were based out of Charleston, South Carolina (Waite). This finding was all too convenient for Taxil and his contributor, Abel Clarin de la Rive, as they were able to pin Ill. Bro.Albert Pike to their conspiracy. It was written in this book that Pike was the head of the Palladists, and the original creator was the Italian lawyer and activist Guiseppe Mazzini. The Palladists were then supposedly broken up when French authorities found out of its existence only a few years after its formation.

It is argued that Mazzini was a Mason, possibly a Grand Master, in the book 10,000 Famous
Freemasons by William R. Denslow, however, the Grand Orient of Italy questions his legitimacy and does not acknowledge him as a Past Grand Master. As for Bro Pike, his alleged involvement with this mysterious group would later be spun off into another book, La Femme et l’enfant dans la franc-maçonnerie universelle (Women and Children in Universal Freemasonry), where the infamous Luciferian quote is first shown. This quote, which states:
“That which we must say to the world is that we worship a god, but it is the god that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The masonic Religion should be, by all of us initiates of the higher degrees, maintained in the Purity of the Luciferian doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay and his priests calumniate him?

Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods; darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive....

Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy, and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil.”

Is sourced to Diana Vaughn in a footnote of the book. The quote and book’s real author, Abel Clarin de la Rive (real name Pierre Abel Clarin Vivant), was one of the people who fell for Taxil’s writings without question, and wished to expand on it. He took Taxil’s ridiculous claims and added his own speculation to it, such as sex magic and rituals (Kreis). Vivant would go on to write Le Juif et la franc-maçonnerie (Jews and Freemasonry), in which he states that both Freemasonry and Palladists were controlled by Jews, and that the rituals were actually based on Jewish Kabbalah.

However, not everyone fell for Taxil’s writings, including other anti-Masonic individuals. Many
pressured Taxil into revealing Diana Vaughn, in person, so that it could make his stories more
plausible. Taxil eventually conceded, and on April 19, 1897, he held a press conference at Société de Géographie, which he stated would be the introduction of Diana to the world and the final proof of his wild accusations. This, of course, never came to fruition; as Leo Taxil, in the midst of clergymen and other opponents of Freemasonry, admitted to making all of it up. His entire confession was printed in a Paris newspaper, Le Frondeur, on the 25th of the same month under the story titled Twelve Years Under the Banner of the Church, The Prank Of Palladism. Miss Diana Vaughan–The Devil At The Freemasons. A Conference held by M. Léo Taxil, at the Hall of the Geographic Society in Paris.

Mr. Jogand-Pages died 10 years later in March of 1907, but we can say, without a doubt, that he is rolling in his grave seeing his joke still being used to influence and misinform people to this day.

Judaism and Freemasonry: A Conspiracy Theorist's
Favorite Tag Team

In today’s constantly connected world, if one finds themselves involved in any sort of social
media, they will no doubt come across antisemitism. It is the dead horse that has been kicked
throughout the centuries, with no shortage of slang terms, dog whistles, and vile rhetoric that
still perpetuates to this day. And, without fail, it has undoubtedly been connected to our
Fraternity. With so much as a click on a hashtag, one can find comments proclaiming that
Freemasonry is “judaism for the goys”, that Freemasonry is the playground for the “global elite” (an antisemetic dog whistle), and that any Mason who speaks against this just “isn’t a high enough level.”

An individual does not have to stray too far from one of the previous writers mentioned to see
this type of hateful rhetoric displayed. Abel Clarin de la Rive continued on with the anti-Masonic and antisemitic writings even after Taxil’s confession. After losing readership in his publication, La France chrétienne, De la Rive went so far as to say that the confession was forced and that Diana Vaughn and the Palladists really still existed (Kreis). It wasn’t until the Dreyfus Affair, a French political scandal that split the Third French Republic, that de la Rive started to gain traction again, mainly fueled by increased antisemitism in the country.

Possibly the biggest source for the tie in between Freemasonry and Judaism is the nefarious
Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion, a publication from 1903 first appearing in Imperial Russia. It is what scholars call “black propaganda”; a type of propaganda intended to look like it was created by those it is supposed to discredit. This document took heavy inspiration from previous books written by Jacob Brafman, namely The Local and Universal Jewish Brotherhoods and The Book of the Kahal. In these books, Brafman claimed that the Alliance Israélite Universelle, and organization in France that was formed for the safeguarding of human rights for Jews around the world, was actually the head of an international conspiratorial network, and its leader was Adolphe Crémieux, a known Freemason. Two other books that seem to have influenced The Protocols are The Conquest of the World by the Jews by Osmen Bey and The Talmud and the Jews by Hippolytus Lutostansky.

All of these writings came together in a disgusting stew to create The Protocols. Twenty four different “protocols” were said to be discussed in the writing, with number 15 being directly tied to how the “Elders” plan to use Masonic lodges to spread their influence across the globe. After being translated from Russian into other languages, notably German and English, the slime that was The Protocols began to infest the rest of the world. Even with the inclusion of Masonry in The Protocols, some of our own Brothers were influenced by its lies, the most famous of which being Henry Ford (Singerman).

These accusations of “evil Jewish influence” can even be seen up until very recently. Only a few weeks ago,, a Mason from Arizona who goes by the screen name “KyleIsBased” on social media, released a recording of the Master Mason degree to his X (formally Twitter) followers. During the videos, “Kyle” has messages appear on screen that tie what is going on during the degree to “secret jewish kabbalah ritual” or “jewish burial rites”, neither of which are part of the degree. Henry Guy Carr, Edith Star Miller, Reverend John Ankerberg, and Alex Jones, are all proponents of The Protocols.

What Can We Do?

After doing even a modicum of research, it seems that the odds are against us Brothers to try
and keep the conspiracies at bay. The reality is, the falsehoods held against the Fraternity have always been there and always will be. As Masons, we can only seek to educate ourselves
properly to the nature of these accusations, so that we may better educate the public in regards to what actually happens in Lodge.

Will there be radicals that attempt to harm our Brothers? Unfortunately, with the current political, social, and economic conditions in the US and abroad, the answer is yes, as we sadly saw what happened in Texas with Bro Robert Wise. This should not deter us with our mission to not only improve ourselves, but improve the communities around us.

Brothers can start small, maybe with a friend group or community night. More experienced and well versed Brothers could branch out to farther reaching means, such as podcasts, Youtube, and other social media ventures. Finally, we do have Brothers who are the public eye, and are considered a positive influence, such as Bro Shaquille O’Neal or Bro Brad Paisley. We can always approach them to see if they would be willing to speak on their positive path with the Fraternity, not in a recruitment sense, but in a more down to Earth, “this helped me grow”, style interview.

A Freemason should never stop growing. Not only in the way of personal growth, but also in the way they approach new technology and the opponents it reveals. Never stop growing. Never stop learning. Never stop educating.

Works Cited
Brayley, Arthur W. “National Magazine: An Illustrated American Monthly.” Internet Archive, The
Bostonian, 1903-1933,
https://archive.org/stream/nationalmagazine24brayrich/nationalmagazine24brayrich_djvu
.txt. Accessed 18 December 2023.
Clement, Pope. “In eminenti.” Papal Encyclicals, 1738,
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/clem12/c12inemengl.htm. Accessed 11 April 2023.
Corp, Edward T. The Stuarts in Italy, 1719-1766: A Royal Court in Permanent Exile. Cambridge
University Press, 2011.
Dominguez, Alex. “Stars Reveal Age of the Pyramids - ABC News.” ABC News, 7 January
2006, https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=119794&page=1. Accessed 27
December 2021.
Elhassan, Khalid. “Cleopatra Lived Closer to the Computer Age than to the Pyramids, and Other
Atypical History Facts.” HistoryCollection.com, 30 December 2019,
https://historycollection.com/cleopatra-lived-closer-to-the-computer-age-than-to-the-pyra
mids-and-other-atypical-history-facts/. Accessed 27 December 2021.
Hause, Steven C. “Anti-Protestant Rhetoric in the Early Third Republic.” JSTOR, Duke
University Press, 1989, https://www.jstor.org/stable/286440?origin=crossref. Accessed
18 December 2023.
Hoffman, Jan. “How Anti-Vaccine Sentiment Took Hold in the United States (Published 2019).”
The New York Times, 24 September 2019,
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/23/health/anti-vaccination-movement-us.html.
Accessed 1 January 2022.
“In Search of the Illuminati: A Light Amidst the Darkness.” In Search of the Illuminati, Journal of
Western Mystery Tradition, 2012, http://www.jwmt.org/v3n23/hataley.html. Accessed 27
April 2023.
Kreis, Emmanuel. “Quis ut Deus ?” Les Belles Lettres, 22 November 2017,
https://www.lesbelleslettres.com/livre/9782251447117/quis-ut-deus. Accessed 18
December 2023.
Le Forestier, René. Les Illuminés de Bavière et la franc-maçonnerie allemande. Archè, 2001.
Mahan, Logan. “The Internet’s Newest Conspiracy Theory Is That Ancient Rome Never
Existed.” Inside Hook, 30 November 2021,
https://www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/internet/roman-empire-never-existed-tiktok.
Accessed 1 1 2020.
Ratzinger, Joseph. “Declaration on Masonic Associations Nov 26, 1983.” Vatican, 26 November
1983,
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_
19831126_declaration-masonic_en.html. Accessed 14 June 2022.
Roberts, John Morris. The Mythology of the Secret Societies. Scribner, 1972.
Roman Catholic Church. “Humanum Genus.” The Holy See, 20 April 1884,
https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18840420
_humanum-genus.html. Accessed 18 December 2023.
Singerman, Robert. “The American Career of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion."” JSTOR,
John Hopkins University Press, September 1981, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23882005.
Accessed 18 December 2023.
Stauffer, Vernon. New England and the Bavarian Illuminati. dissertation. 1918. Google Books,
Columbia University Press,
https://books.google.com/books/about/New_England_and_the_Bavarian_Illuminati.html?
id=nvY7AAAAIAAJ.
Stauffer, Vernon L. “Vernon L. Stauffer's "European Illuminati."” Grand Lodge of British
Columbia, 1918, https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/stauffer.html. Accessed 11
April 2023.
United Grand Lodges of Germany. “The founding history | VGLvD freimaurer.org.” Freimaurerei
in Deutschland, 2021, https://en.freimaurer.org/gruendungsgeschichte. Accessed 27
April 2023.
Waite, Arthur E. “Devil Worship in France, or The Question of Lucifer.” Project Gutenberg,
London, 1896, https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/21258/pg21258-images.html.
Accessed 18 December 2023.

~AR



Please don't call me Andy. -PM, Olive Branch Lodge #16, Freehold, NJ -Fellow of the Society of King Solomon -Fellow of the Grand College of Rites -32° Scottish Rite Mason, NMJ, Valley of Trenton (formally Valley of Central Jersey) -autism dad -garbage man

From The Midnight Freemasons Archives: The Masonic Conspiracy Behind Rolling Rock Beer

by Midnight Freemasons Founder
Todd E. Creason, 33°

 
"Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy."

~Benjamin Franklin

There has always been speculation that there is some connection between Latrobe's Rolling Rock Beer and the Freemasons--I mean, it's obvious, there's a '33' right on the bottle!  And the 33rd degree is the highest degree that can be attained by Freemasons.  Is it possible the Latrobe's were Freemasons?

It's one of those great beer controversies--where did the '33' come from?  Everyone seems to have a theory, and nobody has the definitive answer. 

And there are many theories:

-One common theory is that it was to celebrate the repeal of prohibition in 1933.  That was an important year for brewers and beer drinkers alike!

-Another legend is that the Rolling Rock brewery was started with money won at the horse track. The winning bet was placed on #33, "Old Latrobe," and that is why there is a horse and the '33' on the bottle.

-Another has it that brewers in those early days belonged to the local union #33.

-Another claims the reservoir the brewery got its water from was fed by 33 streams.

And the theories go on and on and on . . .

Sadly, the most likely version is the least exciting.  It may have simply been a printers mistake in the beginning.  This version of the story comes from a very reliable source--the former CEO of the company.  He was also very interested in where that '33' had come from--his name was James Tito.  What he discovered is actually very simple.

The slogan on the back of the bottle read originally:
"Rolling Rock – From the glass lined tanks of Old Latrobe, we tender this premium beer for your enjoyment as a tribute to your good taste. It comes from the mountain springs to you."
That's 33 words.  There were a number of different versions of the slogan in the beginning, but the Latrobe family finally settled on the shortest one--the one that ran only 33 words.  Somebody noted that in the margin, and when it went to the printers, the printers didn't realize that the 33 wasn't part of the text and included it. The mistake wasn't discovered until a large batch of bottles had been produced, and back in those days, the labels were painted right onto the bottles, and those bottles were reused, which explains why the mistake wasn't immediately corrected

And just maybe it wasn't corrected later because of the stir it had created when those bottles reached the public.  Everyone talking about and debating what that '33' meant and speculating about where it had come from.  Perhaps Latrobe saw that controversy as a good thing.  Here it is more than seventy years later, and people are still talking about it.  I guess you'd call that 'beer buzz'.

So that's the big Masonic conspiracy behind Rolling Rock Beer.  It doesn't have anything to do with the Freemasons at all.

Not to propagate a myth, but I can tell you, I do have it on good authority that at least one 33rd Degree Freemason enthusiastically approves of the product--he finds it crisp and refreshing with a easy-to-drink flavor. 

In fact, I think I'll go have one now . . . 

~TEC

I couldn't even guess when I wrote the original version of this piece.  Probably in 2007.  I rewrote it and expanded it after 2011 and again after 2015.  I added the Ben Franklin quote to this version.  Let's just say it's made the rounds over the years.  I like it because it's one of those weird conspiracy theories attributed to the Masons that people like to talk about--like the imagery on the the back of the Grand Seal of the United States that everyone claims is Masonic.  I thought I'd post it again--I saw a discussion on the topic in one of the Masonic social media groups.  They were both wrong as it turns out . . .  Enjoy!

Todd E. Creason, 33° is the Founder of the Midnight Freemasons blog, and an award winning author of several books and novels, including the Famous American Freemasons series. Todd started the Midnight Freemason blog in 2006, and in 2012 he opened it up as a contributor blog The Midnight Freemasons (plural). Todd has written more than 1,000 pieces for the blog since it began. He is a Past Master of Homer Lodge No. 199 and Ogden Lodge No. 754 (IL) where he currently serves as Secretary. He is a Past Sovereign Master of the Eastern Illinois Council No. 356 Allied Masonic Degrees. He is a Fellow at the Missouri Lodge of Research (FMLR). He is a charter member of the a new Illinois Royal Arch Chapter, Admiration Chapter No. 282 and currently serves as EHP. You can contact him at: webmaster@toddcreason.org