Showing posts sorted by relevance for query no mason left behind. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query no mason left behind. Sort by date Show all posts

No Mason Left Behind Pt. One

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bro. "Doc" Gentry



Ok everyone repeat after me, "No man takes a step in Freemasonry alone." Say it again. Come on louder! Like you mean it! LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE! Sorry, I got carried away. Now, what does that mean? The saying, not being carried away. It's simple, oh so simple. From the point where a man says,"I need to talk to a Mason about this Mason thing.", he is not left alone in his steps. He is guided, step by step, and only by taking our time and doing it right, do we see the wisdom in this action.

A man comes to your lodge and says, "I want to be a mason." I encourage you NOT to throw a petition in his face. Take the time necessary to get to know him and his life. In fact, two or three brothers should take somewhere between 6 months to 2 years (whatever your Grand Lodge says to do on the petition ironically) to get to know your potential candidate. "But Brother Doc, he might leave if  we don't push him through." Well then brothers, who's to say that he would actually come to lodge then? Besides, we are Masons, our word is our bond, so don't start the potential brother off on the wrong foot by lying on his petition. Please don't get him started off wrong by pushing it through either. I know, I know, Grand Lodges are freaking out about numbers and attendance and this reason alone should be the basis of you vetting potential brethren more thoroughly. Besides that, how will this potential brother get work and receive instruction if you don't know where his passions are to give him work? Ok step one, get to know the potential brother, check. Step two, get to know his family as well. Don't leave that poor man to try and explain Freemasonry to his family all by himself, he has no idea what Freemasonry is....in fact, I still don't know all of what Freemasonry is, so don't send me in alone either! Invite the family to functions and events. If you don't know what you can and can't tell families, and there are things you can tell them I assure you, go back and read my Mentoring piece. In fact, Brother Johnson, can you link that piece right HERE ?

*Editors Note* I can and I did! ;) ~RHJ

Once the allotted time has passed and he still wants to join you crazy kids, oh and you all still want him to become a brother, then have him fill out the petition. Once he has filled it out and way before you initiate him, assign him a mentor. Do not wait, you will miss valuable opportunities for him to grow, even before he is voted on. What's the worst thing that happens? He doesn't join but is a better person for the expierence?

No Mason Left Behind is not just some cute catch phrase that Brother Robert Johnson branded me with, it is a creed all Brethren should live by. No matter what you do, no one takes a step in Freemasonry alone!



~Doc

Brother Daniel "Doc" Gentry is a Brother Master Mason under the Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Mason's of the State of Illinois, in the 1st Northeast district. His sign is Leo, and has been known to enjoy long walks in blizzards. He is stubborn and has no plans of joining the York or Scottish Rite anytime soon. Also in his spare time, he is a great DM for D&D games. Sacred Geometery! You can reach him by email at doc@midnightfreemasons.org

No Mason Left Behind Part 3

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bro. "Doc" Gentry



I just want to touch on a few things. First, congratulations on taking the first steps in Masonry with your candidate / brother and doing it right with all the advice given to you. I hope you realize that I am just gathering information, the best practices as it were, of the way others have mentored and has been successful. These aren't original "Doc" thoughts, because SUPRISE, I'm not that smart.

Your candidate has taken his time to observe and take in your words of wisdom-- the esoteric teachings to which he has either gone crazy with or thought they were cool and has since moved on. As a brother, and yes as Entered Apprentices, they are brothers on the level, your lodge has invited him to stated meetings and other EA degrees and hopefully your lodge had a Worshipful Master who was smart enough to invite the new brother to the East at these events to see the whole thing from that perspective, I mean what's the purpose of becoming a Master Mason if not only to one day become a Past Master. (I will write another piece on this later, just place that idea to the rear of your mind for now). Your candidate / brother is now absorbing information, asking comprehensive and very deep questions about their journey so far, because if you follow the steps, that is exactly what happens, questions get asked! Also, I hope he is still being encouraged to write in his journal of all the feelings and emotions through each step he has taken. 

The day has finally come for the second degree and you are ready! You give him those really wise words and tell him you will be there to help when it's done. You sit in lodge and watch and someone fumbles their ritual, others forget their lines, and remember, this is the hardest degree to perform, but at the end, so much information is given to the brother and there will be shock from it all, even if it is done correctly. This is your chance to shine brother, to be that Mentor that will go down in the history books, fore you will talk with your Intendee after its all over. 

Don't blow it! Don't say something stupid like, "Do you have any questions?" Or "Would you like me to explain anything?" No, no, no, no! You are smarter then this, you're a Master Mason for goodness sake! You need to block out a good chunk of time after this event, but not right after, because he is going to be confused. Don't believe me? Remember when you did it! Go back into your journal (if you kept one) and look into what you were feeling and thinking right after this. Every brother I mentored, after the second degree feel the need to go write in their journal, it's overwhelming. So wait. Wait until after the cake and pie, wait until after the handshakes and congratulations, wait until after the lodge is closed and locked. Let him take in the second degree before you try and talk about it. They don't even know how to pose the questions they have yet. So when you finally get to the time where you will talk to them, front load some questions you think they are going to have. What's wrong with being prepared? Take a good amount of time to go through these and the ones you have that they don't ask, pose them and answer them anyway. This may take multiple sessions and that's fine, it means they are on the right path in Masonry! We don't just say ritual, real master Mason's know at the baseline what they mean and have enough understanding to explain them simply. We have studied it to not just memorize, but to figure out what we heard. 

Take your time, Freemasonry is not a race, it's a life long journey for the perfect ashlar. You will make mistakes too, admit them. No matter what your Grand Lodge says do not, do NOT, DO NOT pressure that brother to "hurry" their journey. Numbers and retention be damned! These experiences are for him and no one else and you as the Intender should be blessed to be on this journey with them, remember, no one takes a step in Freemasonry alone, not even the Intender, don't forget that. You as the Intender are a Mason, and No Mason Left Behind is not just a cute statement!

~DG

Brother Daniel "Doc" Gentry is a Brother Master Mason under the Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Mason's of the State of Illinois, in the 1st Northeast district. His sign is Leo, and has been known to enjoy long walks in blizzards. He is stubborn and has no plans of joining the York or Scottish Rite anytime soon. Also in his spare time, he is a great DM for D&D games. Sacred Geometery! You can reach him by email at doc@midnightfreemasons.org

No Mason Left Behind Part 4

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bro. "Doc" Gentry


I promise there will only be one to twelve more after this one, so bear with me.  Your candidate/brother, whom you have walked this entire journey with so far, should be fired up! You should be seeing the fruition of the events up to now because you are doing it right. You have introduced him to places like this blog and podcasts like "Masonic Roundtable" and "Whence Came You". You have saturated his life with not only the reading material that he gains from the completion of each degree, but books that help him dive into simple understandings of the craft. If you don’t know any, Born in Blood comes to mind without getting up from my desk (I’m not showing off, I really am that lazy) and this is consuming his life. You are what you eat, remember that phrase.  It is given to not govern the food you eat, though in most cases it seems to be appropriate, but to let you know that you will become what you saturate your life with. Now if you are watching the Daredevil seasons on Netflix, you're not alone there, they are really good.  But you need to have a healthy balance of the everything else (50%) and Freemasonry (50%) in your entertainment.

You have now travelled to the door with your brother for the third time. He is ready and prepared because you have taken each step with him, as well as took the guidance from all these articles. You have parted upon him the simple yet mind blowing words, over all you've prepared to have him in the right mind for this prestigious event. So before all this, did you stop the giggling chuckles and jokes about live farm animals and any other non-serious venture other brothers brought to the brothers ears? Did you part upon him the solemn nature of this degree to which he is about to attain? Have you kept his anxiety down (trust me they are lying when they say they are fine, it is slightly nerve racking and that is a good thing) as well as reassure him that everyone, including yourself has taken this path? Again this is his night, all his, and more importantly this is THE night!!! He is about to become a Master Mason and finally erase all doubts about his equality in the lodge, if he still has any remaining.   

A few personal bits here, kind of close to my heart. If your lodge wants to do multiple third degrees at the same time, fight them! How can this be his day if he is sharing it? How can he feel the impact of the degree if it is being done to others at the same time? How can it possibly effect his life if he does not take the journey in a solemn fashion as to which this degree was intended to be performed? Do not bow down to "the rush"or rather, the push of candidates to brothers to Master Masons as fast as possible, you will do him a disservice!  Do not allow him, if he so chooses, to be pushed aside if he wishes to return his degree in open lodge (if your jurisdiction does this. If they don’t trust me, you are missing out on a lot of opportunity here). This should be his day and his alone. There is a lot to take in here, other meaningless distractions here should be tossed away. I have seen too many multiple third degrees to know that there is not any good to come of it for the brother, it only serves to the pocket books and per diem of the lodge/Grand Lodge. I don’t care about that or them, as a Mentor/Intender my job lay strictly with the brother and only the brother to whom was placed in my care. Then there is my biggest pet peeve and trust me I am close to taking them away and ripping them up in front of these people. DO NOT let that new Master Mason take a petition. I believe that this shouldn't even be allowed in lodge during this time, or before.  It should be a Masonic Offense to allow "Petition Vultures" to circle a new brother, pushing their petitions into his face. Let the man take in the fact that he is a newly raised Master Mason and everything that it entails. If you're one of those brothers who waves a petition in a brand new Master Mason's face, just stop. This is a time of celebration of a man's travels to the degree of Master Mason! Opinions vary, but I would personally like to see a two year waiting list to be able to jump into an appendant body. I digress.

When he is done with this degree, his path is not traveled, it is only beginning. His journey is not done, it has truly just started. This is not the end all be all. The goal is neither chair nor title. The goal of Freemasonry is the betterment of oneself, and that is all it ever is.

Again, make yourself available, and know that there is still much to do. Yes he is a Brother Master Mason on the level, but he is still new. He will have questions that  he doesn't even know yet, nor does he know to ask them.  DO NOT leave him behind now, once a Mentor/Intender always one.  No Mason Left Behind, ever!

~Doc

Brother Daniel "Doc" Gentry is a Brother Master Mason under the Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Mason's of the State of Illinois, in the 1st Northeast district. His sign is Leo, and has been known to enjoy long walks in blizzards. He is stubborn and has no plans of joining the York or Scottish Rite anytime soon. Also in his spare time, he is a great DM for D&D games. Sacred Geometery! You can reach him by email at doc@midnightfreemasons.org

No Mason Left Behind: Part Deux

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bro. "Doc" Gentry



Welcome back all ya'll (that's the plural form of ya'll that don't speak southern). I hope you didn't think the last piece was the "end all be all" of this understanding of us being present, but let's move on to the degrees and let's start on initiation. So if we have followed a healthy train of thought on mentoring, then they have met and talked with the brother the lodge has assigned as a mentor for this individual, the Intender. I hope you have spent time getting to know this possible brother more than just having him come out to you and made an effort to learn more about them outside lodge and to get to know their family, and hopefully for them to get to know yours. Yes, we focus on the individual, our potential new brother, but his family must not feel left out either. 

Hopefully you talked about some of the history, how some states differ, and even explained clandestine freemasonry and the stance by the Grand Lodge of your area on this topic. I hope you know that all clandestine lodges aren't the same. I also hope you had time to explain the difference between irregular and clandestine lodges. Now it's the candidates night!

Your candidate comes into fellowship with the brothers, but he is and should be the focus. If everything goes the right way, he is the focus of the night, all brothers are positioning to talk to him, to know his feelings and thoughts, and even his expectations of the night. Hopefully he has started a journal to write this down because he may forget if he doesn't and without that retrospect later in his Masonic life, he will miss out on growth opportunities. Everything is in place and ready to go and it goes off without a hitch. Ok so what little things did you share beforehand? And did you leave enough mystery to keep this ceremony in a light to leave an impact? Ok did you share 1-3 things of an esoteric value of the degree to which the new brother went through? No!?! Why not? You don't do the esoteric stuff? I got that, but what if the new brother does? I'm not saying you need to delve into the mysteries of Sacred Geometry and give the new brother all the new mysteries of the universe, in fact esoteric studies are proven to bring different light, though similar, to each researcher. You do however, need to know a few things to show them the path and the plethora of different facets our brotherhood has in store for them. 

You see, No Mason Left Behind means that each Intender has a relevant understanding of the various topics within Masonry to be able to speak on a topic to show a direction, not give the answers but give a path that leads to the answers. I know this is tougher for the longer running members sometimes, and there is nothing wrong with their reasons for joining the fraternity. How do you know if it is something you don't like, if you are not sure what it is?

How about the historical aspects of the degree they just went through? Do you understand the ritual enough to translate it for them? You know that mad scientist Einstein said that if you truly know something, you can explain it simple enough that others will understand it, or something like that. I look at it this way, Freemasonry is a lot like the medical field, in that when you think you know it all, you no longer understand any of it. We all, from the newest Entered Apprentice to the 50 year Master Mason need to continue to study, learn and apply Freemasonry. No one takes a step alone, not even the guy who has been Grand Master. In fact the longer you are a Freemason, the more important it is for you to surround yourself with "younger" Freemasons. Not by age, but how long they've been in the brotherhood.

I will leave you with that thought, let it sink in and let the hate-mail come forth. I love you all and like what I say or disagree, please let me know, comment or drop me an e-mail. I would love to hear your thoughts.


In love and on the level,
-Doc   

Brother Daniel "Doc" Gentry is a Brother Master Mason under the Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Mason's of the State of Illinois, in the 1st Northeast district. His sign is Leo, and has been known to enjoy long walks in blizzards. He is stubborn and has no plans of joining the York or Scottish Rite anytime soon. Also in his spare time, he is a great DM for D&D games. Sacred Geometery! You can reach him by email at doc@midnightfreemasons.org

No Mason Left Behind : The Final Cut

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bro. "Doc" Gentry



This will be my final piece (for now) on this subject and I thank you for bearing with me, especially the Intenders and Mentors. In fact, Intenders and Mentors, thanks for all the hard work you do!Let me ask a question,  how many of you ever felt alone when there was a new Brother inducted into the fraternity?  Almost like the job of the lodge is to say, "Oh Brother Dan, you're the candidates Intender." And that is all the lodge does besides the ritual?  Well, let us address this now.

This piece is directed to the lodge as a whole, and especially the three principle officers. Let's address some lodge officers and see if we're doing all we can. Brothers Stewards and Brother Junior Warden, you see the lodge as a whole from your positions and offices, not just in ritual but in general. Brothers Stewards, your jobs are during times of refreshments and fellowship. You have seen the new Brother interact in all aspects of Freemasonry not only in the ritual. What does this new Brother bring to the table of Freemasonry as a whole? Did you explain your offices and what they represent as a whole, to the new Brother?  Brother Junior Warden, did you fulfill your purpose with this new Brother? Did you give the "New Brother Report" to the Senior Warden and the Worshipful Master? You three are the "Open Eyes" of the lodge, I pray you did your duties not only your rituals.

Brother Marshal, Brother Junior Deacon and Brother Senior Warden, how has the west impressed upon this new Brother? Brother Marshal, do you believe that your position is opening and closing the doors? Did you teach the esoteric purpose of your office?  How about you, Brother Junior Deacon? Have you have had the most intimate relationship with this Brother outside of his Intender/Mentor, what have you given him? What did you notice of worth from this Brother? Did you impart the new Brother with old knowledge so that he may grow? Brother Senior Warden, overseer of the West Gate, did you notice this Brother on each of his entries? What imprint did his comings and goings leave upon you? With the information from the Junior Warden, what information can you pass to the Worshipful Master so that he can perform his duties upon this new Brother? 

Finally Brother Senior Deacon and Brother Worshipful Master, you two most of all are responsible  in the development of the new Brother, your fulfillment of your duties are the most detrimental. Brother Senior Deacon, how did you follow through and guide this Brother in his actions outside of ritual? Brother Worshipful Master, did you take the advice and information as well as recommendations from the Junior and Senior Warden? Did you use that to create a plan of action to give this new Brother proper instruction? Do you know how to properly set him to work according to his passions and skills? 

Here's the secret my Brothers, it takes a lodge to raise a Master Mason. As he was given instruction and walked the path through the body, starting at the heart and ending as part of the soul, remember, he did it with the whole lodge.  Did we give him proper resources and instruction? Can we do better in raising a Master Mason? Will we?

No One Takes A Step In Freemasonry Alone! No One!

~Doc


Forget me, not my Obligation

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Bill Hosler, PM


As anyone who has ever donned a Masonic apron knows, Freemasonry has a long and rich history.  It is true no one truly knows where Masonry started. There are many legends people believe as to where it could have begun. But we have no actual written record we can point to as evidence.  


In some ways, our Craft is really a collection of legends, stories, anecdotes, and histories woven together to make a patchwork quilt much like Fraternity itself.  From the legend of the third degree through the allegories down through the Grand lodges and their histories each lodge and the individuals that comprised each square tell a story of a memory of a Brother or a lodge event that made the Fraternity what it is today.  Hearing these stories or recalling a certain event you witnessed can give a just and upright Mason the warm feeling of Brotherly love and affection.   


As most of us know.  Not all these stories and legends are true. Some of these legends were created to illustrate a point or tell a story.  And some sadly were created out of thin air just to give the Craft some “street cred” it truly didn’t need or wasn’t worthy of. 


One of these legends is the well-known “Forget me not” legend. I really was heartbroken when I discovered the truth about this story. In my first few years as a Mason, this story gave me a really warm feeling.  The thought of men risking their lives to aid and assist each other while in the shadow of a murderous regime to me seemed like one of the purest forms of Fraternity. So when I read the works of Most Worshipful Brother Bradley S. & Jean Rickelman “The Myths about Forget-Me-Not Flowers” appearing in The Oklahoma Mason Vol 2 May 2013. And a lodge devotional entitled The Forget Me Not flower – a growing Masonic Myth https://www.lodgedevotion.net/devotion-newsletter-content/editorial-educational-articles/the-forget-me-not-flower-a-growing-myth I can honestly say I was truly broken-hearted.  I really wanted the story to be true. 


I think that is why this one legend gets much more traction than many of the other Masonic legends we meet in our Masonic journeys. We as Masons want it to be true. We need it to be true in our hearts to remind us we are all a band of brothers and we are all there for each other, through thick and thin.  


Another one of these legends that have been sadly debunked in recent years has been the story of General Lewis Armistead in the book “The Better Angels of Our Nature: Freemasonry in the American Civil War” by Most Worshipful Brother Michael A. Halleran https://amzn.to/3BfXjSk


Another debunked Masonic tale is "The lodge over Simpkins store". The sentiment behind this poem, beautiful as it may be, has recently been proved to be fictional by Brother Patrick Dey in Episode number 536 of the Whence came you? Podcast https://wcypodcast.libsyn.com/whence-came-you-0536-the-lodge-that-wasnt-over-simpkins-store


One thing each of these stories has in common (Besides not being true) is they illustrate Masonic principles each Mason cherishes; Faithfulness to your Brethren, dedication to your Masonic obligations, and spreading the cement of friendship and Brotherly love. Just a few of the “Rights, lights, and benefits” a candidate is looking for as he knocks on the door to a lodge room. 


The forget me not and the story about General Armistead are placed in times when Masonry wasn’t just about ritual and reading minutes. And worrying about the lodge building’s roof. It was when men who made a Masonic obligation showed their true character and fulfilled the words they repeated while kneeling with actions. 


So many times, we look to Masonry’s past to try and build our future. We love to point out that George Washington and John Wayne were a Mason or someone else a young man may have read about in his high school history class once with the hope that fact might impress him enough to sign a petition to join. 


Sometimes I don’t think we realize how powerful these legends really are.  Think about how many times you visit a lodge and see you see a Brother wearing a forget me not lapel pin or necktie.  The same with General Armistead. That legend is so powerful and influential to Freemasons that the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania created a monument at the Gettysburg battlefield featuring it. The Northern Masonic Jurisdiction of The Scottish Rite even uses the story to teach a lesson in one of their degrees. In many ways, these legends are as powerful and as essential to American Freemasonry as the legend in the third degree.  


If the craft has any common sense left, we should find a way to use these stories to our benefit, while at the same time pointing out their origins, to teach Masonic brethren about fulfilling their obligations.  Not in a memorized allegorical way where a man will tune it out but in a way that will truly motivate him and at the same be proud of his membership. 


Think of it this way Brethren: No one ever erected a statue or wore a lapel pin memorializing the reading of the minutes or of a pancake breakfast no more than anyone ever wrote a poem to commemorate a fish fry or a treasurer’s report. 


~BH

WB Bill Hosler was made a Master Mason in 2002 in Three Rivers Lodge #733 in Indiana. He served as Worshipful Master in 2007 and became a member of the internet committee for Indiana's Grand Lodge. Bill is currently a member of Roff Lodge No. 169 in Roff Oklahoma and Lebanon Lodge No. 837 in Frisco, Texas. Bill is also a member of the Valley of Fort Wayne Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite in Indiana. A typical active Freemason, Bill also served as the High Priest of Fort Wayne's Chapter of the York Rite No. 19 and was commander of the Fort Wayne Commandery No. 4 of the Knight Templar. During all this, he also served as the webmaster and magazine editor for the Mizpah Shrine in Fort Wayne Indiana.

Quick Masonry

by Midnight Freemasons Contributors
Michael H. Shirley
&
Todd E. Creason

If you hang around on Masonic Facebook pages, blogs, and chatrooms for more than about five minutes, you’ll likely encounter some variation of this question: do Blue Lightnings/One-Day Classes/Short-form Catechisms shortchange new members? Do they experience “Real Masonry™” or “Cheap Masonry”? And, while there are sometimes thoughtful exchanges posted in response, too often what happens is a series of assertions that do not examine the question, but assert that it should take time and effort to become a Mason, and that the products of those classes/short catechisms will invariably drift away, to which others shout back, “I was the product of a one-day class, and I’m twice past master of my lodge.” And so on, ad infinitum.  

We came to Masonry by different routes, and the lessons we learned in our journeys continue to inform our attitude about the process. Our stories may be instructive.

Todd: I really didn't have a choice--I was going through long form. Raymond VanBuskirk, a Past Master of the Lodge, told me in no uncertain terms that if I wanted his signature on the top line of my petition, I would "go through traditional" and learn the long form just as he had. I did want his signature, he had been like a grandfather to me when I was growing up, so I agreed. I spent six months memorizing the first and second degree catechisms. To this day, I think that "going through traditional" is the best way to go. I believe I got more from the experience by taking on that challenge. The difficulty in learning the catechisms and obligations is part of the experience, and should be--it shows the candidate’s true desire to join the Fraternity and his willingness to accomplish something that is very difficult to do. I'll also tell you it was one of the most difficult challenges I'd had up to that point, and having accomplished what I believed at times to be impossible made me a lot more open to taking on goals that seemed daunting in scale after I was raised a Master Mason.

Michael: I tried to do that, and sat on my porch every night memorizing the first-degree catechism. I was two pages into it when the semester began, and work intruded (I’m a history professor). I simply didn’t seem to have the time or energy to memorize the remaining nine pages. Teaching, writing lectures, grading papers, and advising students (not to mention being the father to two young children) took up nearly all of my time. Then, in early October, a student of mine who’d been at my first degree came to my office and said, “I have something to make your life easier.” After realizing that no one had ever said those words to me (or since, come to think of it), I took the short-form catechism he’d brought with him and realized that I already knew the whole thing. I demonstrated my proficiency and was passed to the degree of Fellowcraft within two weeks, and was raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason the following month. While I’m sure that the experience of memorizing the long-form catechism would have been a splendid challenge, the short-form catechism enabled me to advance before I forgot why I petitioned for degrees in the first place.  

Todd: I'm a traditionalist. If I had to do it again knowing everything I know now, I'd probably go through exactly the same way. I've studied history most of my adult life, and part of what attracted me to Freemasonry to begin with was the idea of being part of something that was deeply traditional and hundreds of years old. But most of my motivation for going through traditional was the idea of experiencing something in the same way Raymond VanBuskirk had experienced it seventy years earlier in the same Lodge, and my great-grandfather Clarence Swengel had experienced it nearly a century before at Neoga Lodge. I wouldn't do it any differently, but I've come to know that the value I've taken from this Fraternity isn't in all those words I memorized long before I'd even attended a Lodge meeting. It was the first few steps of the journey itself that really mattered.

Michael: I’ve had the honor of conferring many degrees, both in my own lodge and in others. The many Brethren whom I met at the Altar of Masonry professed to be deeply moved at the Work. I’ve also helped with Blue Lightnings, including one where we conferred Second and Third Degrees on fifteen candidates at the Danville, Illinois Masonic Temple (Illinois rules require that Blue Lightning candidates must receive their First Degrees in their home lodge). The logistics of a Blue Lightning are certainly different, but the Brethren who received their degrees that day proclaimed themselves delighted at finally proceeding in their Masonic journeys, and were deeply appreciative of the many Brethren who came to help. They seemed no less moved than the Brethren who received their degrees in the traditional way. What seemed to matter in both cases was the seriousness and brotherly love exhibited by the Brethren who came to help confer the degrees.

Todd: There was a snowstorm the evening before my 3rd Degree--several inches of snow, thirty mile-per-hour winds, and icy snow drifted roads. By 5 that morning the wind had died down. My degree was scheduled for 10 o'clock. My wife and I spent a couple hours digging my truck out of the driveway, but all the while I was waiting for the call saying my degree would have to be rescheduled. The call never came, and so when I finally got my truck out, I made the treacherous trip to the lodge. It was full of men. Master Masons had come from several local lodges, and even Raymond, who was nearing ninety at the time, made it to the lodge for the degree. As any Master Mason will tell you, that experience is something they'll never forget. It was the same for me. When I left that day, I felt different. I wasn't just a Master Mason, but I was part of something and I knew it. All those men had braved the snow and the ice to provide me with that experience on a cold Saturday morning. I'd reached that goal I'd worked towards for six months, but I knew that wasn't it. I was just at the beginning of a journey--I'd merely taken the first three steps along a very long path.  

Michael: My lodge is one block from my house, and it wasn’t snowing, so I walked there for my Third Degree. The dining room was full when I got there, and much to my surprise, I found Past Grand Master David Miller and Grand Master Noel C. Dicks there in all their regalia. (I wasn’t special: Noel Dicks lives twenty miles away from me, and his lodge—Arthur Lodge No. 825—was then the go-to lodge for degree work in our district. Since I was going to be the first Master Mason raised in my lodge in three years, it was apparently an all-hands-on-deck evening.) Most Worshipful Brother Miller obligated me, and Most Worshipful Brother Dicks raised me to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason, and that moment of raising was so moving that I wasn’t entirely sure what had happened. I felt different, more alive, and very much more in contact with the Supreme Architect of the Universe than I had after my first two degrees. Petitioning for my degrees had been a leap of faith, and that faith had been rewarded. The ritual to which I’d been exposed, and the example of the men who’d initiated, passed, and raised me, had planted me firmly on the road to Masonic enlightenment. The catechism I’d memorized almost didn’t matter. What did matter was that I wanted to deserve the work they’d done. I wanted to be worthy to be called “Brother.”

Michael/Todd: If you went through short form, you probably believe short form can have tremendous advantages for a candidate. If you go through long form, you'll most likely extoll the advantages of going through in the traditional way. But the question remains--is one way better than the other?  

As it turned out, even though Todd learned a lot of ritual in the very beginning, the precision and discipline of performing Lodge floor work has never been something he's excelled at even after hours of practice. As Senior Deacon during his Lodge's Rededication, he has the dubious honor of being the guy who smacked the Grand Master of the State of Illinois in the knee with his rod turning a poorly executed turn. After he served as Worshipful Master of his lodge, he took a comfortable seat behind the Secretary's desk where he plans on staying for a long, long time--there have been no injuries since he took that chair four years ago. Nearly all his contributions to Freemasonry are done behind the scenes--writing, organizing, managing.  

And Michael, who took the shortcut, has learned the ritual well enough to teach it. He's twice past Master of his lodge, is a Certified Lodge Instructor, and serves the Grand Lodge of Illinois as an Assistant Area Deputy Grand Master.  

So what’s the answer? Long form or short form? We’re not here to give you that answer. Maybe it's not even the right question to ask. Perhaps the question should be, which one is right for the candidate? We’re all different, and we learn in different ways. Some people learn to swim best by being thrown in at the deep end of the pool, while others would scream for the lifeguard and never go near water again. Some need to move quickly, whether because of the way they prefer to learn or because of the circumstances of their lives; others would be best served by careful lessons, starting in the shallow end, taking their time, and really absorbing everything before moving on to the next step on their Masonic journey. Some lodges, with healthy and active memberships, have programs for bringing new members along that sometimes starts well before they’re even allowed to petition. Other lodges haven’t the wherewithal to do that yet, and need to bring members along as quickly as they’re able. In both cases, focusing on the new Brother has to be at the center of their efforts. 

Arguing about long form versus short form or traditional versus Blue Lightning misses the point. The parable of the tortoise and the hare is instructive, but it can also be misleading. We all wind up at the same finish line. What matters is the journey we take to get there. Slow and steady can win the race, particularly when pitted against fast and careless, but speed is not the issue: what matters is steady. However a new Brother best learns, whatever the circumstances of his life that may limit the time he can devote to learning his catechism, if his lodge is steady with him, he will be firmly grounded in Masonry. When our journey is done, that will have been what mattered.

TEC/MHS

Todd E. Creason, 33° is the Founder of the Midnight Freemasons blog and continues to be a regular contributor. He is the author of several books and novels, including the Famous American Freemasons series. He is a Past Master of Ogden Lodge No. 754 (IL), and currently serves as Secretary.  He's also a member of Homer Lodge No. 199.  He is a member the Scottish Rite Valley of Danville, the York Rite Bodies of Champaign/Urbana (IL), the Ansar Shrine (IL), Eastern Illinois Council No. 356 Allied Masonic Degrees, Charter President of the Illini High Twelve in Champaign-Urbana (IL), and a Fellow of the Missouri Lodge of Research.  He was recently awarded the 2014 Illinois Secretary of the Year Award by the Illinois Masonic Secretaries Association.  You can contact him at: webmaster@toddcreason.org

R.W.B. Michael H. Shirley serves the Grand Lodge of Illinois, A.F. & A.M, as Leadership Development Chairman and Assistant Area Deputy Grand Master of the Eastern Area. A Certified Lodge Instructor, he is a Past Master and Life Member of Tuscola Lodge No. 332 and a plural member of Island City Lodge No. 330, F & AM, in Minocqua, Wisconsin. He currently serves the Valley of Danville, AASR, as Most Wise Master of the George E. Burow Chapter of Rose Croix; he is also a member of the Illinois Lodge of Research, the York Rite, Eastern Illinois Council No. 356 Allied Masonic Degrees, Eastern Star, Illini High Twelve, and the Tall Cedars of Lebanon. The author of several articles on British history, he teaches at Eastern Illinois University.You can contact him at: m.h.shirley@gmail.com

The Legacy

by Midnight Freemasons Founder
Todd E. Creason, 33°


It's inevitable--the older you get the more you think about what you're leaving behind.  Have you made a difference?  Have the things you've done left an impact?  Have you been a good father?  What will remain of you after you've gone?

I don't think about my legacy much, but a couple weeks ago, I found myself in a local tavern.  I was lost, so I'd stopped for directions.  Perfectly innocent.  I didn't want to appear rude, so I had a couple beers while I was there . . .  No, my wife didn't believe that either.  Anyway, when I visited the men's room, I noticed the mirror over the sink.  There was a little bronze plaque on it.  It said, "In Memoriam: Joe Smith."  I changed the name, but that little plaque got me thinking that I hope I leave more behind than a mirror in a men's room in a local watering hole.  

Many Freemasons achieve at least some small level of immortality in their Masonic Lodges.  If you visit a lodge, old or new, you'll see pictures of the Past Masters on the walls.  You'll find evidence of those men that came before you without trying very hard at all.  And those are wonderful tributes to those Masons that have dedicated themselves to Freemasonry.

But that's not what I want to leave behind.  What I want to leave behind isn't a faded picture of my handsome face.  What I want to leave behind is a strong lodge.  I want to leave my lodge better than it was when I found it.  I want it to be a place that continues to inspire men.  I want it to be a place that continues to teach us how to improve ourselves.  But most of all, I want it to still be there when my grandson is old enough to petition.  And his son, too.  Because I believe Freemasonry is that important--especially today in our increasingly valueless society.

But change is hard in a Masonic Lodge, and too many Lodges are on a path that will lead to their eventual demise--coasting through meeting after meeting to their inevitable end.  Members are hesitant to change things, or try new things.  I've found that out the hard way.  I've been working at it for a long time, and it's always been two steps forward, and three steps back.  But we're finally making some slow progress forward.  

The other thing that makes change so tough in a Masonic lodge?  You spend years working your way through the progressive line, and you finally find yourself in the East.  You have it all planned out, and you have a great year (or two) in the East, and you're so happy with what you've accomplished.  Then the election comes, and a new Mason is elected Worshipful Master.  And he has all kinds of ideas of his own, and that direction you were taking falls by the wayside and your Lodge heads in a new direction.  And what about your legacy?  In most cases, two or three years down the road, there's not much left of it.  

You'll find that true at the Lodge level, and at the Grand Lodge level as well.  I was the Secretary of a Lodge for a long time, and every two years without fail, the focus, the rules, and the emphasis changed with the installation of a new Grand Master.  But I've been very fortunate to have recognized this trend early on, and I've found a way to mitigate that constant shifting focus that comes with a new captain at the helm every year or two.  It works well, so I'm going to share it with you.  

I've been fortunate to have been involved in creating two new Masonic bodies!  I know--that's pretty uncommon in today's world!  But in 2012, a group of us chartered a new High Twelve Club in Champaign, Illinois--Illini High Twelve.  It took us a couple years to get it together, and of course, we wanted to do a few things differently than a typical High Twelve, so we had some convincing to do.  But it happened finally, and I was the Charter President.  Several Presidents later, it's still going strong, and doing basically the same thing we wanted to do when we began.  

And right now, we're in the process of chartering a brand new Chapter of the Royal Arch--again, with a very different slant.  It's a Chapter with a focus on education.  That seems to be a theme with me.  Anyway, Education is the focus of every chapter meeting.  Not a very typical format for the Royal Arch Chapter.  Again we had some convincing to do, but in June our Charter was approved but the Grand Chapter of Illinois.  I have little doubt that our new Chapter, Admiration Chapter, will still be education based for a long time to come.  

How do I know that?  Because when we put together the Illini High Twelve and Admiration Chapter, we sat down with our charter members, and our charter officers, and we put together a plan of what we wanted to do.  Those two organizations both started with a crystal clear vision of purpose.

Lodges are no different.  If you want to leave a legacy--a lasting change--you have to get everyone on the same page.  As I said before, established lodges are harder to change without a doubt.  But it can be done.  But you're not going to do it during your year or two in the East, so get that idea out of your head.  Nobody is that visionary.  You've got to get your heads together and come up with some consensus of what you want to do going forward.  That way each successive Worshipful Master advances that goal further down the road rather than shift the focus entirely.  

I'm currently the Master of Homer Lodge No. 199 (IL).  It's an old lodge, and it has been teetering on the edge of closure for years.  We serve two year terms in Homer, because in the past, we've barely had enough to open some months.  Some years ago we had the discussion--should we try and save the lodge, or should we merge the lodge with nearby Ogden Lodge No. 754.  We decided to make one final push to save it.  

I'm at the beginning of my second year.  Since that conversation some years ago, all the hard physical work to restore the Lodge has been managed by my predecessors.  The Lodge is beautiful.  It's been patched and painted, roofed, some brick work has been done, and everything has been cleaned and polished.  Let's just say we've all invested a lot of sweat equity into that old building--and it is a jewel.  That building also serves as the home of the new Admiration Chapter.  Since the restoration it has been used by the Knight Masons, the Allied Masonic Degrees, the York Rite, the Scottish Rite, the Shriners, and has been rededicate by the Grand Lodge of Illinois (first time we believe that Lodge had been visited by the Grand Lodge since the building was dedicated in 1893).  

It fell on me during my term to fill it up with new Masons.  We tried a number of things last year, with somewhat disappointing results.  This year, we're working on the meetings.  Every meeting is an event.  We start with education, and we invite local lodges to join us.  Slowly, the word is getting out.  We've added a few dual members.  We've had a few guests join us for our education programs.  Change is beginning to take hold.  

In fact, we recently received a petition from a young man whose great-grandfather was a member of our lodge.  He visited the lodge during one of our open houses.  You should have seen the look on his face when he found photos of both his great-grandfather and his great-grandmother hanging on our walls--they were both active in the Eastern Star Chapter that met in our building many decades ago.  When members of my lodge see things like that, it makes all that hard work worth it.  

Now my exit from the East is coming, but I have no worries.  What I started during my term will continue.  Because it's not just me.  The next two Worshipful Masters are on the same page--incidentally the next two Worshipful Masters are also Midnight Freemasons contributors.  I'm pretty lucky to have Greg Knott as a Senior Warden, and Darin Lahners as a Junior Warden.  We share the same view of the importance of Masonic education and member development to lodge health and growth.  But the most significant factor is that the members of Homer Lodge are really enjoying the meetings!  If we can continue having great meetings that our members look forward to, and adding new members, I think Homer Lodge will be around for some years to come.  

As Masons, ensuring the continuation of our Lodge should be our legacy.  How are your great-grandkids going to see your picture hanging on the wall if your lodge closed decades before they were born?

~TEC

Todd E. Creason, 33° is the Founder of the Midnight Freemasons blog and is a regular contributor.  He is the award winning author of several books and novels, including the Famous American Freemasons series. He is the author of the From Labor to Refreshment blog.  He is the Worshipful Master of Homer Lodge No. 199 and a Past Master of Ogden Lodge No. 754.  He is a Past Sovereign Master of the Eastern Illinois Council No. 356 Allied Masonic Degrees.  He is a Fellow at the Missouri Lodge of Research. (FMLR) and a charter member of a new Illinois Royal Arch Chapter, Admiration Chapter U.DYou can contact him at: webmaster@toddcreason.org

“No Talking Politics!” - A Glance at Freemasonry and Politics

by Midnight Freemason Contributor
Patrick Dey


At the end of last month Darin Lahners posted on this blog a post in which he says that Freemasonry is “supposed to be a refuge from Religion, Politics, and other sectarian subjects.” And that is the general opinion of brothers within our polite gentlemen’s society: that we should avoid talking about the three things that give our individual lives any value, meaning, or purpose: politics, religion, and sex. Now, while I commend Bro. Darin on his article, I do have to dispute the extent to which Masonry and politics have remained separate, if they have ever been separate, and if they even can be separate.

Freemasonry and politics walk hand-in-hand, almost since its origins as a social club, and really long before that. For instance, the old guild system was an economic system, which means it was by extension a political arm of social-economic policies. Guilds were government sanctioned monopolies. To be, say a baker, and practice in a commercial capacity, you had to be part of the bakers guild. Sure, you could bake at home for your family, but if you wanted to bake and sell bread, you had to contend with the guild, who had the blessing of the king, governor, or whomever has granted them the monopoly. Guilds had patrons, usually an aristocrat who had a vested interest in the commercial work of the guild. For instance, if one owned a silver mine, they would be a patron of the silversmith guild. The patron would lend his political influence to curry favors for the guild from the king or governor, and likewise would help enforce regulations the king has mandated upon a guild, which also ensures his commercial interests in the work of that guild. Such was a matter of public health and safety, maintained quality of production, et cetera. So long before Freemasonry emerges from the stonemason guilds as a symbolic gentlemen’s club, it was already a political organization.

As laissez-faire capitalism emerges, and soon thereafter communism, the guilds as the dominant politico-economic system begins to wane. It is these two opposing economic systems that effectively kill the guilds, as both were equally in opposition to the guilds as they were to each other. Yet, more and more non-operative Masons were still joining the remnants of the stonemason guilds, effectively as patrons. And like the old patrons, though they may not have had a commercial interest in stonemasonry, they were nearly all aristocrats, the likes of which include Sir Robert Moray (initiated in 1641) and Alias Ashmole (initiated in 1646). These gentlemen appear to have used Symbolic Masonry as a private club to rub shoulders and advance scientific and philosophical agendas in a socio-political capacity, and such political ideologies would continue on into the formation of the Premier Grand Lodge of England in 1717.

One need only look at the driving personalities behind the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, as well as the relationship many of these men had to preceding events in England to see the politics embedded in Freemasonry from its very start.

Ric Berman traces the politics behind the formation of the Grand Lodge of England in several of his books (e.g. Inventing the Future, his Prestonian lecture, et al), which I will outline here using his work. As Protestantism spread and gained followers in the 16th and 17th centuries, especially in France, Catholics grew increasingly belligerent toward them. Hundreds of thousands of French Huguenots were massacred over the course of two centuries by French Catholic Kings. One need only look at St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in 1572 or the Dragonnades implemented under King Louis XIV to see how terribly Huguenots were treated: theft, rape, torture, murdered… absolutely awful. And over the course of these two centuries the Huguenots would trickle out of France into Germany, Switzerland, North Africa, and most popularly to England. Then in 1685 the last vestige of protection any French Protestant had was revoked by King Louis, and that previous trickle turned into a flood of mass migration of Protestants. And England was very sympathetic to their plight, providing asylum, charitable funds to support them, opportunities for work, et cetera. It is estimated that post-1865 the population of London was 10% Huguenot.

And why wouldn’t England be accommodating to them? They had spent decades trying to get rid of Catholic rulers. And with George I and James Stewart contending for the throne, it became dire for England to keep James from assuming the throne, and thus George I of the House of Hanover became King. There was a serious threat that James would attempt to seize the throne, and he did try, several times, and France, Rome, and Spain all supported him. Over the years a number of Jacobite uprisings occurred to attempt to dethrone George I, but all failed. Had James seized the throne, all those Huguenots that sought asylum in England would have entered into the same predicament they were in previously.

The personalities behind the formation of the Grand Lodge of England were all aristocratic (with the exception of Anthony Sayer, the first Grand Master). They were noblemen with high-ranking titles, advocated pro-Enlightenment philosophy and scientific pursuits, Protestant, and pro-Hanoverian. Jean Theophilius Desaguliers, the third Grand Master, was the son of a Huguenot refugee from France. He grew up poor, his father working for a church in North London, which did not include a salary, but a stipend provided to all the workers for the amount of service they provided, which they split collectively. But Desaguliers becomes wealthy and greatly respected, rising through the ranks rapidly in a way that was almost unprecedented prior to the Huguenot migration.

All the Grand Masters for the first few decades were pro-Hanoverian. That is, they supported Enlightenment ideologies, they promoted meritocracy for social advancement rather than a rigid class system in which there was next to no social mobility; they championed freedom of religion, which was unheard of in its time; they promoted equal rights within governance, such as each man gets a vote and each vote is equal, regardless of social standing. And they provided a social club that would permit such to be implemented. As long as you could afford to pay your dues as a Freemason, you could practice whatever religion you wanted, and it allowed for a simple laborer to have as much right to become Worshipful Master of a lodge as a duke or lord, and that both had the same value in their votes.

This was wildly unheard of. It was truly radical, and deeply political. We might put this on par with, say, a lodge in South Carolina admitting a person of color into their lodge, or any lodge anywhere admitting a transgender or gender-non-conforming person into Masonry. Sure, today we look at Article I of the Constitutions of Free-Masons (1723) and think: “Oh yes, they were wise and ahead of their time.” No, they were absolutely radical. I’m certain there were Masons at the time who were saying: “Keep politics out of the Lodge!” when the Constitutions was published in 1723. And as a note, while we are not totally certain, most scholars firmly believe that Desaguliers was the author of the Charges.

Then look at Article II of the Charges, which specifically states that Masons maintain a “peaceable” subservience to the government, but there is still no problem with a Mason being rebellious toward his government: “So that if a Brother should be a Rebel against the State, he is not to be countenanc’d in his Rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy Man; and if convicted of no other Crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and ought to disown his Rebellion, and give no Umbrage or Ground of political Jealousy to the Government for the time being; they cannot expel him from the Lodge, and his Relation to it remains indefeasible.”

Let’s put that into perspective. I remember during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 there were a lot of brothers I heard advocating for the expulsion of any Mason who participated in those protests. Every Grand Master in the United States issued a formal letter condemning the violence at those protests, and yet, only two Grand Masters formally condemned the violent actions of the insurrectionists on January 6, 2021, and likewise the same brothers calling for the expulsion of BLM protestors were suddenly very quiet on January 6. Double-standards aside, and explicit political biases aside as well, in either instances, so long as a brother did not actually commit a crime, or least was never charged and found guilty of a crime, then no action should be taken against him in the Masonic fraternity, at least according to Desaguliers, Anderson, etc. A brother may have supported the Black Lives Matter movement, or even supported the violence on the Capitol while Congress was in session, but unless he actually did anything, his political opinion is not chargeable. Sure, he may be regarded as an “unhappy man” and all Masons should “disown his rebellion,” but nothing else could be done. It is wild to me, personally, that both rebellions could be weighed the same by Masons, and yet the framers of the Constitutions of 1723 would have seen it exactly like that.

This would be like the Premier Grand Lodge of England permitting a Catholic supporter of James Stewart to become Grand Master… and they did. Philip Wharton, the First Duke of Wharton, was just such a person. Where everyone else was Protestant and pro-Hanoverian, when the Duke of Montagu stepped down as Grand Master, the Duke of Wharton stepped up. He had long been placated by the King and the high-ranking aristocracy, being given titles and lordships to subdue his passions as a Jacobite and win his loyalty to the King. He was also a wildcard, likely being a libertine, and certainly indulging in transgressive and immoral activities. He was even the founder of the original Hellfire Club. However, soon Masons grew tired of his Jacobite rhetoric, and his Deputy Grand Master, Desaguliers, would push him to step down from Mastership. Mind you, at the time, there were still ongoing Jacobite revolts and they were real threats to the Throne of England. We might put this on par with a member of Al Qaeda becoming a Grand Master… and then only urging him to stepdown as Grand Master and no further action taken against him, so long as he was not actually engaged in any crimes. Yep. All anyone can say is: “Booooooooooo!”

It is easy for us look back at the politics of the early Grand Lodge of England and see it as mere “history.” We don’t see all this as deeply political, or even radically political, but it was. We lose sight of the implications of these things because they happened in England a long time ago. Yet, even as history marches forward, we will see again and again Freemasonry intwined with politics.

Freemasonry is a social club, and thus is typically a reflection of the larger socio-political climate it is situated within. I could probably do a second part to this piece to further elaborate, and I probably should, but for now, I will leave it at this. We could deeply explore the politics behind various anti-fraternization policies of Grand Lodges during the American Civil War, as well as how many brothers chose to ignore those policies (and just as many followed them). I have previously explored on the Whence Came You? podcast how most Freemasons and Grand Lodges in Germany renounced Freemasonry and signed up with the Third Reich when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany… a reality that is very contrary to the feel-good narrative we are fed about the origin of the Forget-Me-Not. Heck, even today, I have wondered how the Grand Master of Russia could run against Putin for President and not end up going missing (it has been rumored that the two are very close friends and that Putin actually has some influence over how Freemasons conduct themselves politically in Russia). We could look at how Freemasons have committed treason together (e.g. Boston Tea Party) as well as build a nation and even form states (e.g. it is well known that Freemasons had a huge and mighty hand in the formation of the State of Colorado).

Time and time again we will find that Freemasonry is very political, or at least politics and Freemasonry often walk hand-in-hand, no matter how much we say otherwise. The larger issue isn’t that we need to keep politics out of the Lodge or that our fractured political climate in the United States is bleeding over into the Lodge. No, the bigger issue is that we are confusing our patriotism with our politics.

We know we have a deeply divided political climate in this country. The issue has become that one side of the political aisle thinks their politics is “patriotic” and thus the other side are seditious bastards. Each side thinks their party is correct and walking with God, so the other side is wrong, and therefore we are the patriotic side
. If being antisemitic is the policy of one side, then the other side that says, “Hey maybe we don’t exterminate Jewish people,” then the former will claim that any favor extended to Jewish people is unpatriotic... and horrible things tend to follow shortly thereafter, historically speaking. Swap “Jewish” with “transgender” and the same point stands. Frame the same scenario with gun laws and suddenly one side is full of terrorists that want to rip this country apart! (See how I kept that example vague, and you already think it fits your point of view?)

It's not that politics in Masonry is dangerous. It’s how far sideways political identity has tipped. Bro. Darin’s original point in his post still stands: a lack of thinking, a total lack of reason in guiding our political understandings, a complete lack of original rhetoric in how we understand how we live and make policies together, has led to a decay in how politics can ever be appropriate within Masonry. Thus, what we are left with is left or right-wing soundbites regurgitated as if original, but ultimately is a lot of “sound and fury, signifying nothing.” This is when politics in Masonry becomes dangerous: when politics can’t be a part of Masonry.

~PD

 

Patrick M. Dey is a Past Master of Nevada Lodge No. 4 in the ghost town of Nevadaville, Colorado, and currently serves as their Secretary, and is also a Past Master of Research Lodge of Colorado. He is a Past High Priest of Keystone Chapter No. 8, Past Illustrious Master of Hiram Council No. 7, Past Commander of Flatirons Commandery No. 7, and serves as the Secretary-Recorder of all three. He currently serves as the Exponent (Suffragan) of Colorado College, SRICF of which he is VIII Grade (Magister), and is a member of Gofannin Council No. 315 AMD and Kincora Council No. 8 Knight Masons. He is a facilitator for the Masonic Legacy Society, is the Editor of the Rocky Mountain Mason magazine, serves on the Board of Directors of the Grand Lodge of Colorado’s Library and Museum Association, and is the Deputy Grand Bartender of the Grand Lodge of Colorado (an ad hoc, joke position he is very proud to hold). He holds a Masters of Architecture degree from the University of Colorado, Denver, and works in the field of architecture in Denver, where he resides with wife and son.